Legendary Indian cricketer, Sunil Gavaskar gave clarification regarding his walk-out incident during the Melbourne Test of 1981, saying it was the Australian players’ “get lost” call, and not his LBW dismissal, that prompted him to storm off the ground with his opening partner. In the 1981 series, which was dogged by some inconsistent umpiring, a Dennis Lillee in-cutter caught Gavaskar plumb in front, and umpire Rex Whitehead, standing in just his third Test, raised his finger.
However, Gavaskar, who thought that the ball had got his bat on the way to the pad, stood his ground long enough. During a recent chat with 7Cricket, Sunil Gavaskar said, “The misconception is that I was upset at the lbw decision. But the walk-off happened only because, as I had gone past Chetan (Chauhan) on the way to the change-rooms, the Australians had given me a spray. They told me to get lost, which is where I’ve come back and asked Chetan to walk off with me.”
ALSO READ: Dale Steyn Decides Not To Take Part In The Upcoming IPL 2021
Gavaskar also slapped his pads with the bat, and his anger was quite evident about his anger. When he was reluctant to leave, Lillee reportedly made one comment too many and the Indian snapped, returned to the crease, and instructed fellow opener Chetan Chauhan to walk off the pitch with him.
A bemused Chauhan did as he was told, but at the boundary rope, the batsmen were met by team manager Shahid Durrani and assistant manager Bapu Nadkarni.
Elaborating the same, Gavaskar said, “I got an inside-edge as you can see from the forward short leg fielder. He hasn’t done anything, he hasn’t moved. Dennis (Lillee) is telling me, “It hit you there,” and I’m trying to say, “No I hit it.” And now you see, I’ve asked Chetan to walk off with me,” said the former India captain narrating the incident on a show where it was played out for him.”
ALSO READ: David Warner Still Not 100 Percent To Play A Test Match
In his earlier interviews, Gavaskar has said that he regretted the decision to leave the field in such a controversial manner.
